Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan‘s outspoken CEO, has finally gotten at least a small taste of what it feels like to eat humble pie. Dimon has gone out of his way ever since taxpayers bailed out the big banks to say JP Morgan should never have been lumped in with the rest of the financial community since it had its act together above all others. Not so.
Instead, as everyone knows by now, JP Morgan has just announced it will be taking some heavy trading losses, so Dimon’s assertion that JPM was the cream of the crop no longer holds water. In fact, it could end up being the irony of all ironies if, because of JPM’s actions, all banks are finally subject to additional scrutiny, including the Volcker rule, that Dimon has publicly slammed.
To refresh here, the Volcker rule, named after former United States Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, was introduced as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The whole idea was to prevent taxpayer backed banks like JPM from making speculative bets that are not beneficial to their customers. So, the fact that Dimon has been so vocally opposed to the rule makes him look foolish after this latest incident.
Not only does it make Dimon look foolish, but it has already cost one high level executive, Ina Drew, her job and you can bet there will be more to follow. The big question then becomes; will Dimon himself be forced out? For certain, he has been one of the shining stars in an industry fraught with trouble, but the current foibles at JPM point out that even the “best of the best” aren’t really able to keep a tab on all that goes on in such a large financial institution. This is fodder for all of the anti-bank and Wall Street folks who have felt shafted by the banks every since they were bailed out back in 2008.
Of course, like most other bank debacles, this will likely pass as well, with JPM going on business as usual. However, there is a scenario where the political winds just might be strong enough for something to actually come out of the Volcker rule. This could have the effect of making it more difficult for banks like JPM to place such risky bets with customer money.
No matter what happens from here, there’s one thing you can be absolutely sure of; this won’t be the last time we hear of such large trading losses. It’s the nature of the beast, and as long as banks are making big bets, there will be big losses. The minimum we should do then is to make bank executives like Dimon suffer the consequences if losses occur under their watch.